Navigating Expertise: High-Reliability Organisations vs Organisational Coaching
- David Wollage
- Feb 16, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Oct 22, 2024
In the ever-evolving landscape of safety management and leadership, two seemingly contrasting principles appear to conflict; the concept of 'Deference to Expertise' in High Reliability Organisations (HROs) and the belief in Organisational Coaching that the coachee holds the key to solutions within themselves. Let's take a closer look at these two approaches and explore how they converge and diverge in practice.

High-Reliability Organisations: Trusting in Expertise
High-reliability organisations (HROs) are entities that operate in complex and high-risk environments, such as aviation, healthcare, and nuclear power. In these settings the stakes are high and errors can have catastrophic consequences. HROs prioritise safety, reliability, and the prevention of failures through meticulous planning, rigorous training, and a culture that values deference to expertise - asking the people who do the job the best way to do it safely.
In HROs, individuals with specialised knowledge and experience are recognised as authorities in their respective domains. There is a strong emphasis on following established protocols and deferring to the judgment of experts, even in situations where hierarchical structures might suggest otherwise; such as between organisational leaders and front-line operators. This principle is rooted in the understanding that frontline workers possess invaluable insights and expertise crucial for maintaining safety and operational excellence.
Organisational Coaching: Unleashing Internal Capacities
On the other hand, Organisational Coaching operates on the belief that individuals are inherently capable of identifying and implementing solutions to challenges they face. This is because the challenges dealt with by coaching are not a lack of knowledge or a technical skill exactly! If we review the performance equation by Sir John Whitmore (covered in another blog post here) Performance = Potential - Interference we can see that the challenge faced by individuals is with 'Interference'. This can be limiting beliefs, biases, value-based decisions, motivation, lack of structure to thinking, etc Coaches facilitate this process by providing a supportive environment, asking powerful questions, refraining from providing direct solutions or imposing their views, and empowering coachees to tap into their 'own' expertise and resources.
Wrap-Up: Embracing Diversity of Thought
While the principle of 'Deference to Expertise' in High-Reliability Organisations and the belief in internal capabilities in Organisational Coaching may seem divergent, they are actually very closely aligned. Both approaches value the ‘individual’ with their knowledge and valuable insights they offer, they just 'Defer' to different experts. HRO outwardly, Organisational Coaching inwardly.
Komen